Welcome to Calradia, the year is 1717, and the smell of sulfur hangs in the air. Musket fire and cannonades echo across the land as Calradia is once again beset by war. Our story begins in the declining Calradian Empire of the 18th century, it's borders bombarded ceaselessly by countless enemies that surround them. Fight with daring riflemen, dashing Hussars or battle hardened grenadiers under your command as you serve the modern nations of Calradia or begin your journey as the Emperor or Emperoress in this land of chaos.
Poll: do you set a vassal as marshall? |
Posts | ||
---|---|---|
kingdom marshall | Locked | |
Thread Options | ||
Mar 20 2013 Anchor | ||
when you are king, you can chose a Marshall for your kingdom, not discussing being marshall of another king, here we talk about YOUR marshall. granting one of your vassals as marshall can have serious effects, some are handy and others not so much. another effect is that your vassals start holding feasts, this can be a great bonus as your vassals have their own relations, and feasts are a great way to increase these. The lords who hold a lot of feasts end up having a lot of friends and with that more people willing to help them in battle, if they cannot hold feasts it will have an impact on your empire cohesion and might result in villages getting raided when your vassals CAN stop this, but refuse to due to personal fueds withs the owner of the village. it allso takes away responsibility for you to lead your army's all the time, considering you can always make yourself marshall again this is a great perk. often i find that my main army is sieging a place meaning that i do not have to build that siege tower myself, and can respond to more immediate dangers that will show up, but it might backfire as your marshall leads the army into disaster and you lacking the authority to take command instantly, and lead your own army's to victory. it's a double edged sword. in the end it comes down to two options, do you take full control of your army and lead them to victory or death, or do you allow others to do this giving you the freedom to do whatever needs to be done? |
||
Mar 24 2013 Anchor | ||
Personaly I choose to lead the armies of The Free People of Calradia, though when there is no war going on I hand down the Marshalship to my trust worthy and noble vassel: Lord Grainwad or Lady Augustina who will usualy just ride around hunting bandits whilst I travel with my brave companions doing quests for the local village elders and occasionaly obliterating an angry swarm of brigands. Edited by: Archie_Duke |
||
Mar 25 2013 Anchor | ||
Same. During peace time just so they organize feasts and get relations with each other. It can make a huge difference. I did let "marshall Dodewaert" conquer the Khergits but that was mostly to test how he'd perform. Usually when it becomes critical I make myself marshall and lead my men to victory, but later on when you have half the map there are just to many things to do, and because my army is mostly unstoppable I don't care to lead it anymore.
These two always get into fights with my other vassals, and especially Grainwad I have a grudge against, hes not the kindest guy around.... Edited by: shorun |
Only registered members can share their thoughts. So come on! Join the community today (totally free - or sign in with your social account on the right) and join in the conversation.